The factual situation in the negotiations is that there is no solution, that the differences between the two parties are profound and that bringing the two positions closer together is hardly likely any time soon, home and Greek analysts say. The difference in relation to the previous round of negotiations is that this time round there are profound differences over mediator Nimetz’s concrete proposal and that he dared speak openly about the Greek government’s positions.
Macedonian President Gjorge Ivanov said Thursday that while there was consent that the word ‘Macedonia’ should be included in the solution, there was still no rapprochement of the positions.
“What Mr. Nimetz said is a reality and we expect Greece to stick to the framework within which the negotiations are conducted. The other party always sets ultimatums and wants to see only its own demands met disregarding the other party’s demands and needs,” he said without answering whether it was true that the Macedonia authorities accepted that the name should include a geographic qualifier and that the problem now was where to put it.
However, the Macedonian Government’s Sector for Public Relations issued an announcement Thursday saying that the Government of the Republic of Macedonia did not agree with any geographic qualifier as a solution to the name dispute with Greece. The announcement further says that the press conference of mediator Matthew Nimetz may be misinterpreted to the effect that both parties agreed upon a geographic qualifier yet disagreed over its position.